DNA Tests Could Fulfill God’s Promise to Abraham by Revealing Millions of Jews. But How Jewish is Jewish Enough?
Recent advances in DNA testing are the final stage in bringing about a special vision of Messiah, one that will fulfill God’s promise to Abraham while uniting all three major Abrahamic religions, believes a prominent rabbi and former member of Knesset."This is the special function of the final generation before the Messiah, which we are clearly in right now: to bring close all the descendants of Jews that were lost to the Jewish people,”
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
DNA Tests Could Fulfill God’s Promise to Abraham
Monday, November 28, 2016
Homosexual Man Sues Bible Publishers 70 Million Dollars Because The Bible Has Anti-Homosexual Verses
From suing Christian businesses, now the sodomites are trying to sue the Bible itself! A homosexual deviant is suing a Christian publishers 70 million dollars because the Bible they published has verses against homosexuals.
http://shoebat.com/2015/07/11/homosexual-man-sues-bible-publishers-70-million-dollars-because-the-bible-has-anti-homosexual-verses/
http://shoebat.com/2015/07/11/homosexual-man-sues-bible-publishers-70-million-dollars-because-the-bible-has-anti-homosexual-verses/
Culling the Herds
So, in the late spring of 1933, the federal government carried out "emergency livestock reductions." In Nebraska, the government bought about 470,000 cattle and 438,000 pigs. Nationwide, six million hogs were purchased from desperate farmers. In the South, one million farmers were paid to plow under 10.4 million acres of cotton.
The hogs and cattle were simply killed. In Nebraska, thousands were shot and buried in deep pits. Farmers hated to sell their herds, but they had no choice. The federal buy-out saved many farmers from bankruptcy, and AAA payments became the chief source of income for many that year.
It was a bitter pill for farmers to swallow. They had worked hard to raise those crops and livestock, and they absolutely hated to see them killed and the meat go to waste. Critics charged that the AAA was pushing a "policy of scarcity," killing little pigs simply to increase prices when many people were going hungry.
Agriculture Secretary Henry A. Wallace said that since there was too little demand for pork products, farmers couldn't run an "old folks home for hogs and keep them around indefinitely as pets." But even Wallace relented, recognizing the desperate need in the country. He pledged that the government would purchase agricultural products "from those who have too much in order to give to those who have too little." The AAA was amended to set up the Federal Surplus Relief Corporation (FSRC), which distributed agricultural products such as canned beef, apples, beans and pork products to relief organizations.
Yet the basic governmental approach of supporting farm prices by reducing supplies continues to this day.
Written by Claudia Reinhardt and Bill Ganzel, the Ganzel Group. First written and published in 2003.
http://www.livinghistoryfarm.org/farminginthe30s/crops_17.html
Also see:
Great Myths of the Great Depression
https://fee.org/resources/great-myths-of-the-great-depression-pdf-and-audio/
Monday, November 21, 2016
Jerusalem chief rabbi calls LGBT community 'cult of abomination'
Chief Sephardi Rabbi of Jerusalem Shlomo Amar spoke out harshly against Reform Jews and the LGBT community in an interview with Israel Hayom's weekend supplement this week. He went as far as to call Reform Jews "evil" and homosexuals "a cult of abomination," prompting LGBT community leaders to launch complaints with the police for incitement
http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=38063
FBI Warns Of Thanksgiving Terror Potential
...Sources tell CBS News the FBI is alerting police across the country about a potential terrorist attack around Thanksgiving. It specifically warns of homegrown terrorists. Potential targets? Shopping malls, special events, crowded venues–locations in Washington, D.C. and Virginia described as target-rich zones
Friday, November 18, 2016
Bible Publishers
Local Church Bible Publishers
http://localchurchbiblepublishers.com/bibles/
Bearing Precious Seed
http://www.bpsmilford.org/
The KJV Store & LCBP
http://www.thekjvstore.com/kjv-bibles/by-publisher/lcbp.html
Common Man's Reference Bible
http://www.thekjvstore.com/kjv-bibles/by-publisher/pure-words-common-man.html
Trinitarian Bible Society
http://www.thekjvstore.com/kjv-bibles/by-publisher/trinitarian-bible-society.html
Cambridge
http://www.thekjvstore.com/kjv-bibles/by-publisher/cambridge.html
Differences in King James Bible texts
http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/kjv.asp
http://localchurchbiblepublishers.com/about/faq/
http://www.thekjvstore.com/f-a-q
http://localchurchbiblepublishers.com/bibles/
Bearing Precious Seed
http://www.bpsmilford.org/
The KJV Store & LCBP
http://www.thekjvstore.com/kjv-bibles/by-publisher/lcbp.html
Common Man's Reference Bible
http://www.thekjvstore.com/kjv-bibles/by-publisher/pure-words-common-man.html
Trinitarian Bible Society
http://www.thekjvstore.com/kjv-bibles/by-publisher/trinitarian-bible-society.html
Cambridge
http://www.thekjvstore.com/kjv-bibles/by-publisher/cambridge.html
Differences in King James Bible texts
http://www.chick.com/ask/articles/kjv.asp
http://localchurchbiblepublishers.com/about/faq/
http://www.thekjvstore.com/f-a-q
Thursday, November 17, 2016
NIV Interdenominational Masterpiece - Even For JWs
NIV Interdenominational Masterpiece - Even For JWs
"But does it all really matter," one might ask, "if I can support what I believe with the NIV?" Yes, if someone else can refute what you believe with that same translation. While you could prove, for example, the Deity of Jesus by using the NIV, someone else can disprove His Deity by using the NIV. While you could prove the virgin birth with this translation, another could disprove it with this same translation-whichever be their pleasure. The NIV is clearly an "Interdenominational Masterpiece" that can cross any church threshold and make all within happy with whatever they believe. A remarkable illustration of this can be seen in the following:
Perhaps there is no religious movement less respected by Born Again Christians than the religion of the Jehovah's Witnesses. Furthermore, there is no version of the Bible less cared for by Christians than the Jehovah's Witness Bible, the New World Translation. However, if a Jehovah's Witness were to exchange his Bible, the New World Translation, for the NIV, he would find it surprisingly much to his liking. Consider for example these facts: In this book, we looked at 147 places in the KJV where words or whole verses were omitted in the NIV. Of these 147 omissions, 146 of them ARE ALSO OMITTED IN THE JEHOVAH'S WITNESS BIBLE. If you were to add to these omissions all of the word changes found in the NIV that have been noted in this book, you would find the Jehovah's Witness Bible and the NIV in agreement IN BETTER THAN FOURTEEN OUT OF EVERY FIFTEEN CASES.
In fact, some Jehovah's Witnesses have found the NIV so much to their liking that a minister told me that, on one occasion, he observed them using it while witnessing. Why members of an organization so void of the truth and bent on destroying the Deity of Jesus would use the NIV certainly demands an explanation from somebody!
Something to ponder: I do not know of one Christian who uses a New World Translation nor have I ever heard that such a Christian exists. Have you? Yet, the NIV, whose contents so closely resemble those of the New World Translation, is the best selling Bible in the English speaking world today. If that is not a paradox, what is?
Excerpted from If the Foundations be Destroyed, by Chick Salliby
https://www.chick.com/bc/2001/masterpiece.asp
"But does it all really matter," one might ask, "if I can support what I believe with the NIV?" Yes, if someone else can refute what you believe with that same translation. While you could prove, for example, the Deity of Jesus by using the NIV, someone else can disprove His Deity by using the NIV. While you could prove the virgin birth with this translation, another could disprove it with this same translation-whichever be their pleasure. The NIV is clearly an "Interdenominational Masterpiece" that can cross any church threshold and make all within happy with whatever they believe. A remarkable illustration of this can be seen in the following:
Perhaps there is no religious movement less respected by Born Again Christians than the religion of the Jehovah's Witnesses. Furthermore, there is no version of the Bible less cared for by Christians than the Jehovah's Witness Bible, the New World Translation. However, if a Jehovah's Witness were to exchange his Bible, the New World Translation, for the NIV, he would find it surprisingly much to his liking. Consider for example these facts: In this book, we looked at 147 places in the KJV where words or whole verses were omitted in the NIV. Of these 147 omissions, 146 of them ARE ALSO OMITTED IN THE JEHOVAH'S WITNESS BIBLE. If you were to add to these omissions all of the word changes found in the NIV that have been noted in this book, you would find the Jehovah's Witness Bible and the NIV in agreement IN BETTER THAN FOURTEEN OUT OF EVERY FIFTEEN CASES.
In fact, some Jehovah's Witnesses have found the NIV so much to their liking that a minister told me that, on one occasion, he observed them using it while witnessing. Why members of an organization so void of the truth and bent on destroying the Deity of Jesus would use the NIV certainly demands an explanation from somebody!
Something to ponder: I do not know of one Christian who uses a New World Translation nor have I ever heard that such a Christian exists. Have you? Yet, the NIV, whose contents so closely resemble those of the New World Translation, is the best selling Bible in the English speaking world today. If that is not a paradox, what is?
Excerpted from If the Foundations be Destroyed, by Chick Salliby
https://www.chick.com/bc/2001/masterpiece.asp
The NIV and NASB are the same bibles as the Jehovah Witnesses' NWT
The NIV and NASB are the same bibles as the Jehovah Witnesses' NWT
Good morning . Id like to ask all of the readers who use the NIV as their final authority if they consider the Rusellites, better known as the Jehovah's witnesses, a cult, or do you call them your brothers? The reason why I'm asking this question is because I'd like to show the NIV reader who believes JW's are deceived just what he is up against if he tries to preach to them using the NIV. Id also like to show why it is that so many people are calling these deniers of the truth about Jesus 'brothers in Christ.' I shall be able to show both of these points at the same time, for I will prove that there is very little difference between the NIV and the Jehovah Witness' bible. When a JW says 'the bible' he means The New World Translation. According to the 1984 Edition of the New World Translation, in the forward by the New World Bible Translation Committee, June 1, 1984, it describes all of the revisions that they've made over the years. This committee reveals itself to us clearly, when it states, and I quote
"In 1969 the Committee released 'The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, which presented under the Greek text revised by Westcott And Hort (1984 reprint) a literal word for word translation into English"
Now we have here the open admission that the New World Bible Translation Committee used these corrupt texts penned by these two corrupt and unfaithful men. Note also that they say 'a translation of THE Greek Scriptures' as if there were only one set of Greek texts. They certainly wouldn't mention the Textus Receptus to these poor followers of Russell and Rutherford. For if they knew there was another word out there that contradicted their own, they would KNOW BELIEVE and UNDERSTAND as it says in Isaiah 43:10 that Jesus most assuredly DID say WHO HE WAS. John 8:58 says "Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. "
The Rusellites have distorted these beautiful and simple words of our Lord into "Jesus said to them: Most truly I say to you, before Abraham came into existence, I HAVE BEEN."
People, I hope you heard that. I HAVE BEEN? My GOD is not a HAVE BEEN! When Moses was on the mount before God, and asked Him what to tell the people when they asked who God was, Did God say 'I HAVE BEEN THAT I HAVE BEEN?' NO!!! Did he tell Moses to tell them "I HAVE BEEN HATH SENT THEE'? NO!! The word of God in Exodus 3:14 says And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you. And by the way, do you think "before Abraham came into existence" is easier to understand than "before Abraham was"?
Anyway, if the I AM in Hebrews 8;58 is changed, the reference to exodus 3:14 is LOST, and anyone reading it that way will not know that Jesus is the I AM in John 8:58 and the SAME I AM that spoke to Moses from the burning bush.
People listen carefully and hear what the New World Translation gives to the people in their version of exodus 3:14! "At this God said to Moses; "I SHALL PROVE TO BE WHAT I SHALL PROVE TO BE"! And he added "this is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, 'I SHALL PROVE TO BE has sent me to you.'"
Oh my!! Isaiah 8:20 of the King James bible is the first verse that comes to mind, for it says "To the Law and to the testimony, if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." The lights are out for sure on this one, people!
Another thing about the new world translation I'd like to point out to you is that it contradicts itself concerning their Jehovah and their Jesus. In Deuteronomy 32:39 of the NWT, it says "see that now I - I am he, And there are no gods together with me. ..." But in John 1:1 of the NWT, it says, "In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God and the Word was a god." Hear the contradiction? are there no gods together with him, or is there a god with him?
Now, NIV reader, or NASB reader, or even Catholic New American Bible readers, this question is for you...what if you were faced with the situation of having to PROVE to any Jehovah's Witness that Jesus Christ is truly God? Lets find out. If you were to quote the following verses to a JW, by the time it was all over you might be asking yourself if YOU aren't a JW and just didn't know it!
In the NWT of Luke 2:33 we read this: "And ITS FATHER and mother continued wondering at the things being spoken about IT." In the NIV of Luke 2:33, we read the following: "The child's father and mother marveled at what was said about him."
And finally, let us hear the word of God, Luke 2:33 "And JOSEPH and his mother marveled at those things which were spoken of him." (KJV)
Wow folks did you hear that? The NIV and the NWT BOTH say 'father' instead of JOSEPH. Is Joseph Jesus' father? NO!! If he were, Jesus would not be the only BEGOTTEN Son of God. The NWT makes it even worse by calling HIM, Jesus, and "IT". (IT?? Is this for the benefit of those freaks out there who think Jesus is an extra-terrestrial?) Speaking of Begotten, lets look at John 1:18 for a moment.
The NWT of John 1:18 reads: "No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten god which is in the bosom [position] with the father is the one that has explained him."
Let me point out that the 'only begotten god' is with a small 'g', which helps out the Rusellite position that Jesus is just a 'little god'.
Now lets look at the NASB: "No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained [Him.]"
Look at that! The NASB has a begotten God too. Granted, this 'god' gets a capital 'G', but unless I forgot how to count, I see TWO GODS here!!
The NIV changes this ever so slightly, so as to give the illusion it is not in agreement with these. "No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, [5] [6] who is at the Father's side, has made him known." See? only God the one and only has seen God. Looks like two gods in the NIV too.
Finally people, let us hear the word of God, John 1:18: "No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him."
Amen!
Lets now compare 1Timothy 3:16
The NWT says "Indeed the sacred secret of this godly devotion is admittedly great. HE was made manifest in the flesh..." The NIV says "Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: HE [6] appeared in a body..."
HE? HE WHO?? Did you know that in the doctrines of the New Age movement, they say that 'Christ' really means 'Christ Consciousness' and that this is something any person can achieve for themselves? They further state that several people managed to have the "Christ consciousness', including Buddha, Confucius, Jesus, and Mohammed. So, for the New Ager, the either of the two modern versions quoted here would be suitable for them, because neither of them make the designation of who HE is...HE could be ANYBODY!! The NIV even further magnifies this new age belief by stating that this undesignated "HE" just APPEARED in a Body! The JW has no problem denying Jesus is God here because there is no designation for HE in the NWT either. Finally, The KJB says "Without Controversy great is the mystery of godliness...GOD was manifest in the flesh..."
Every one of these new versions says "HE" instead of GOD. Is there any doubt about WHO was manifest in the flesh, when one is reading the King James Bible? JESUS was the flesh of God...GOD was manifest in the flesh, not some unnamable "HE" (which the New Agers call the "unknown and unknowable") and certainly not Buddha or Krishna or Confucius like the New Age would have us believe! There are hundreds of other verses where 'Jesus' or 'Lord' or 'Christ' or 'God' has been replaced with 'HE', including Acts 4:24, and Mark 13:6. And, people, don't go looking in the new versions for the Godhead, because he's NOT THERE!!
There are three references to the word 'Godhead' in scripture. Acts 17:29, Col 2:9, and Rom.1:20 The NWT and NIV are IDENTICAL in their changing of the word Godhead into DIVINE BEING. Let me point out that its no surprise that the Rutherford version changes this, as they are deniers of Jesus anyway. But why does the NIV read identically? Why? because people they used the SAME CORRUPT TEXTS!! The same spirit that questioned and changed God's word clear back in the garden is in these modern versions. The same spirit of antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son, dwells in these perverted "bibles"!!
Lets move on now to Ephesians 3:9. There is a key piece of information REMOVED from this verse in the new versions.
The NWT of Eph 3:9 reads:" And should make men see how the sacred secret is administered which has from the indefinite past been hidden in God who created all things."
The NIV reads: Ephesians 3:9 "and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things."
The NASB and the Catholic NAB are also missing the same key piece of information. What information is that? Lets see what the word of God tells us:
The KJB says: Eph 3:9 "And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, WHO CREATED ALL THINGS BY JESUS CHRIST."
There it is people. 'By Jesus Christ' is the information missing from the new versions. We know from the true word of God, that Christ made all things, and NOTHING was made without him. (John 1:3, KJB)
Another place where the new versions agree with each other, including the NWT, and disagree with the King James Bible is in Philippians 2:6:
The NWT says "who, although he was existing in God's form, he gave no consideration with seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God." NIV says "Who being in very nature god, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped."
Now lets look at these two carefully. They appear to be different, but they are both making the same statement. The NWT says "gave no consideration...that he should be equal to God"...and the NIV says "did not consider equality...something to be grasped." Both of these version say he did NOT consider himself equal with GOD or even able to 'grasp' or 'seize' such a notion. But listen to the Word of God, people, for it again leaves no doubt about who Jesus said he was.
The King James says, Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:"
Jesus did NOT consider it ROBBERY TO BE EQUAL. Its not that he DID NOT CONSIDER being equal with God...but considered it NOT ROBBERY to BE EQUAL with God. So it boils down to, to be, or not to be...that IS the question! And the King James Bible has THE ANSWER!!
So the new version reader who believes the Jehovah's witness is deceived, by now must be able to see that these are in agreement with each other. A clever JW, and they are clever, could use this agreement between bibles as an opportunity to sway someone to Kingdom hall. All he would have to do is say, See? we believe the same thing. Our bibles tell us so!
Finally dear readers, let's look at one more verse. This verse is from the glorious book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ. Hear how the new versions, including the NWT butcher this one:
The NWT says in Revelation 1:11 "saying, What you see write in a scroll and send it to the seven congregations..."
The NIV says "which said, "write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches."
The NASB says "saying, Write in a book what you see, and send it to the seven churches."
But the KJB says " Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches..."
Now, because the Jehovah's witnesses openly and publicly deny Jesus Christ is God, its not a big mystery why they would wrench 'Alpha and Omega' from the scriptures. What about the others? What purpose would they have to hide the fact that Jesus Christ is God? Perhaps it was because the men behind the Greek texts ALSO publicly denied Jesus Christ is God. The translators of the NIV were sodomites, heretics, and obviously staunch ecumenists. This ecumenism has swept the world. How? The modern perversions! So, NIV, NASB and other modern version readers, the next time a JW comes knocking on your door, will you have any other choice but to slam the door in their faces? Did you know that ALL of the verses that are completely OMITTED and wiped out from the NWT are ALSO completely wiped out from the NIV? Verses like Matt 18:11, Luke 17:36, Romans 16:24, 1John 5:7, and many many others? You couldn't preach to them the true doctrines of Christ and try to win them to the truth! The bibles you and they use are from the SAME Greek texts created by the SAME men who say the SAME things against our Lord, our God, Jesus Christ. I sincerely hope you will take up a study between the New world translation and the other modern versions. Add it to your list of bibles in agreement with you and against the King James Bible. If you say the JW's are deceived, maybe even a cult, you are correct. But you will never be able to prove it using the modern bibles.
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/niv_and_%20nasb_are_same_bibles_as_nwt.htm
Good morning . Id like to ask all of the readers who use the NIV as their final authority if they consider the Rusellites, better known as the Jehovah's witnesses, a cult, or do you call them your brothers? The reason why I'm asking this question is because I'd like to show the NIV reader who believes JW's are deceived just what he is up against if he tries to preach to them using the NIV. Id also like to show why it is that so many people are calling these deniers of the truth about Jesus 'brothers in Christ.' I shall be able to show both of these points at the same time, for I will prove that there is very little difference between the NIV and the Jehovah Witness' bible. When a JW says 'the bible' he means The New World Translation. According to the 1984 Edition of the New World Translation, in the forward by the New World Bible Translation Committee, June 1, 1984, it describes all of the revisions that they've made over the years. This committee reveals itself to us clearly, when it states, and I quote
"In 1969 the Committee released 'The Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures, which presented under the Greek text revised by Westcott And Hort (1984 reprint) a literal word for word translation into English"
Now we have here the open admission that the New World Bible Translation Committee used these corrupt texts penned by these two corrupt and unfaithful men. Note also that they say 'a translation of THE Greek Scriptures' as if there were only one set of Greek texts. They certainly wouldn't mention the Textus Receptus to these poor followers of Russell and Rutherford. For if they knew there was another word out there that contradicted their own, they would KNOW BELIEVE and UNDERSTAND as it says in Isaiah 43:10 that Jesus most assuredly DID say WHO HE WAS. John 8:58 says "Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. "
The Rusellites have distorted these beautiful and simple words of our Lord into "Jesus said to them: Most truly I say to you, before Abraham came into existence, I HAVE BEEN."
People, I hope you heard that. I HAVE BEEN? My GOD is not a HAVE BEEN! When Moses was on the mount before God, and asked Him what to tell the people when they asked who God was, Did God say 'I HAVE BEEN THAT I HAVE BEEN?' NO!!! Did he tell Moses to tell them "I HAVE BEEN HATH SENT THEE'? NO!! The word of God in Exodus 3:14 says And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you. And by the way, do you think "before Abraham came into existence" is easier to understand than "before Abraham was"?
Anyway, if the I AM in Hebrews 8;58 is changed, the reference to exodus 3:14 is LOST, and anyone reading it that way will not know that Jesus is the I AM in John 8:58 and the SAME I AM that spoke to Moses from the burning bush.
People listen carefully and hear what the New World Translation gives to the people in their version of exodus 3:14! "At this God said to Moses; "I SHALL PROVE TO BE WHAT I SHALL PROVE TO BE"! And he added "this is what you are to say to the sons of Israel, 'I SHALL PROVE TO BE has sent me to you.'"
Oh my!! Isaiah 8:20 of the King James bible is the first verse that comes to mind, for it says "To the Law and to the testimony, if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them." The lights are out for sure on this one, people!
Another thing about the new world translation I'd like to point out to you is that it contradicts itself concerning their Jehovah and their Jesus. In Deuteronomy 32:39 of the NWT, it says "see that now I - I am he, And there are no gods together with me. ..." But in John 1:1 of the NWT, it says, "In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God and the Word was a god." Hear the contradiction? are there no gods together with him, or is there a god with him?
Now, NIV reader, or NASB reader, or even Catholic New American Bible readers, this question is for you...what if you were faced with the situation of having to PROVE to any Jehovah's Witness that Jesus Christ is truly God? Lets find out. If you were to quote the following verses to a JW, by the time it was all over you might be asking yourself if YOU aren't a JW and just didn't know it!
In the NWT of Luke 2:33 we read this: "And ITS FATHER and mother continued wondering at the things being spoken about IT." In the NIV of Luke 2:33, we read the following: "The child's father and mother marveled at what was said about him."
And finally, let us hear the word of God, Luke 2:33 "And JOSEPH and his mother marveled at those things which were spoken of him." (KJV)
Wow folks did you hear that? The NIV and the NWT BOTH say 'father' instead of JOSEPH. Is Joseph Jesus' father? NO!! If he were, Jesus would not be the only BEGOTTEN Son of God. The NWT makes it even worse by calling HIM, Jesus, and "IT". (IT?? Is this for the benefit of those freaks out there who think Jesus is an extra-terrestrial?) Speaking of Begotten, lets look at John 1:18 for a moment.
The NWT of John 1:18 reads: "No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten god which is in the bosom [position] with the father is the one that has explained him."
Let me point out that the 'only begotten god' is with a small 'g', which helps out the Rusellite position that Jesus is just a 'little god'.
Now lets look at the NASB: "No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten God, who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained [Him.]"
Look at that! The NASB has a begotten God too. Granted, this 'god' gets a capital 'G', but unless I forgot how to count, I see TWO GODS here!!
The NIV changes this ever so slightly, so as to give the illusion it is not in agreement with these. "No one has ever seen God, but God the One and Only, [5] [6] who is at the Father's side, has made him known." See? only God the one and only has seen God. Looks like two gods in the NIV too.
Finally people, let us hear the word of God, John 1:18: "No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him."
Amen!
Lets now compare 1Timothy 3:16
The NWT says "Indeed the sacred secret of this godly devotion is admittedly great. HE was made manifest in the flesh..." The NIV says "Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great: HE [6] appeared in a body..."
HE? HE WHO?? Did you know that in the doctrines of the New Age movement, they say that 'Christ' really means 'Christ Consciousness' and that this is something any person can achieve for themselves? They further state that several people managed to have the "Christ consciousness', including Buddha, Confucius, Jesus, and Mohammed. So, for the New Ager, the either of the two modern versions quoted here would be suitable for them, because neither of them make the designation of who HE is...HE could be ANYBODY!! The NIV even further magnifies this new age belief by stating that this undesignated "HE" just APPEARED in a Body! The JW has no problem denying Jesus is God here because there is no designation for HE in the NWT either. Finally, The KJB says "Without Controversy great is the mystery of godliness...GOD was manifest in the flesh..."
Every one of these new versions says "HE" instead of GOD. Is there any doubt about WHO was manifest in the flesh, when one is reading the King James Bible? JESUS was the flesh of God...GOD was manifest in the flesh, not some unnamable "HE" (which the New Agers call the "unknown and unknowable") and certainly not Buddha or Krishna or Confucius like the New Age would have us believe! There are hundreds of other verses where 'Jesus' or 'Lord' or 'Christ' or 'God' has been replaced with 'HE', including Acts 4:24, and Mark 13:6. And, people, don't go looking in the new versions for the Godhead, because he's NOT THERE!!
There are three references to the word 'Godhead' in scripture. Acts 17:29, Col 2:9, and Rom.1:20 The NWT and NIV are IDENTICAL in their changing of the word Godhead into DIVINE BEING. Let me point out that its no surprise that the Rutherford version changes this, as they are deniers of Jesus anyway. But why does the NIV read identically? Why? because people they used the SAME CORRUPT TEXTS!! The same spirit that questioned and changed God's word clear back in the garden is in these modern versions. The same spirit of antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son, dwells in these perverted "bibles"!!
Lets move on now to Ephesians 3:9. There is a key piece of information REMOVED from this verse in the new versions.
The NWT of Eph 3:9 reads:" And should make men see how the sacred secret is administered which has from the indefinite past been hidden in God who created all things."
The NIV reads: Ephesians 3:9 "and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things."
The NASB and the Catholic NAB are also missing the same key piece of information. What information is that? Lets see what the word of God tells us:
The KJB says: Eph 3:9 "And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, WHO CREATED ALL THINGS BY JESUS CHRIST."
There it is people. 'By Jesus Christ' is the information missing from the new versions. We know from the true word of God, that Christ made all things, and NOTHING was made without him. (John 1:3, KJB)
Another place where the new versions agree with each other, including the NWT, and disagree with the King James Bible is in Philippians 2:6:
The NWT says "who, although he was existing in God's form, he gave no consideration with seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God." NIV says "Who being in very nature god, did not consider equality with God something to be grasped."
Now lets look at these two carefully. They appear to be different, but they are both making the same statement. The NWT says "gave no consideration...that he should be equal to God"...and the NIV says "did not consider equality...something to be grasped." Both of these version say he did NOT consider himself equal with GOD or even able to 'grasp' or 'seize' such a notion. But listen to the Word of God, people, for it again leaves no doubt about who Jesus said he was.
The King James says, Philippians 2:6 "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:"
Jesus did NOT consider it ROBBERY TO BE EQUAL. Its not that he DID NOT CONSIDER being equal with God...but considered it NOT ROBBERY to BE EQUAL with God. So it boils down to, to be, or not to be...that IS the question! And the King James Bible has THE ANSWER!!
So the new version reader who believes the Jehovah's witness is deceived, by now must be able to see that these are in agreement with each other. A clever JW, and they are clever, could use this agreement between bibles as an opportunity to sway someone to Kingdom hall. All he would have to do is say, See? we believe the same thing. Our bibles tell us so!
Finally dear readers, let's look at one more verse. This verse is from the glorious book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ. Hear how the new versions, including the NWT butcher this one:
The NWT says in Revelation 1:11 "saying, What you see write in a scroll and send it to the seven congregations..."
The NIV says "which said, "write on a scroll what you see and send it to the seven churches."
The NASB says "saying, Write in a book what you see, and send it to the seven churches."
But the KJB says " Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last: and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches..."
Now, because the Jehovah's witnesses openly and publicly deny Jesus Christ is God, its not a big mystery why they would wrench 'Alpha and Omega' from the scriptures. What about the others? What purpose would they have to hide the fact that Jesus Christ is God? Perhaps it was because the men behind the Greek texts ALSO publicly denied Jesus Christ is God. The translators of the NIV were sodomites, heretics, and obviously staunch ecumenists. This ecumenism has swept the world. How? The modern perversions! So, NIV, NASB and other modern version readers, the next time a JW comes knocking on your door, will you have any other choice but to slam the door in their faces? Did you know that ALL of the verses that are completely OMITTED and wiped out from the NWT are ALSO completely wiped out from the NIV? Verses like Matt 18:11, Luke 17:36, Romans 16:24, 1John 5:7, and many many others? You couldn't preach to them the true doctrines of Christ and try to win them to the truth! The bibles you and they use are from the SAME Greek texts created by the SAME men who say the SAME things against our Lord, our God, Jesus Christ. I sincerely hope you will take up a study between the New world translation and the other modern versions. Add it to your list of bibles in agreement with you and against the King James Bible. If you say the JW's are deceived, maybe even a cult, you are correct. But you will never be able to prove it using the modern bibles.
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Bible/niv_and_%20nasb_are_same_bibles_as_nwt.htm
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
GOP Already Back-Peddling on Campaign Promises
A call to christians, conservatives, libertarians, and republicans everywhere to not go to sleep just because we have a republican president elect, and a republican controlled house and senate.
Yes, it will be better than having Hillary or Obama in office.
However, any ground we might think we have gained or hope to gain is lost if we allow ourselves to be blind to reality, if we don't stand guard, if we rest on our laurels just because Trump won the election.
Where Hillary would have unwavering marched forward the moral and economic destruction of the US, Trump might listen and waffle our way from time to time.
A difference can only be made if we take advantage of this last open window of freedom and ability to influence how we are governed.
1. Fine with sodomite "marriage"
2. Obamacare
Before Election: “On day one of the Trump Administration, we will ask Congress to immediately deliver a full repeal of Obamacare"
After Election: After his meeting with President Obama, Trump said he would consider alternatives to an all-out appeal. Trump told the Wall St. Journal “Either Obamacare will be amended, or repealed and replaced."
Trump's presidential transition website also omits Trump's call to allow Americans to import prescription drugs from other countries where they are sold at lower prices
3. The Wall
Before Election: "I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall" Trump said repeatedly. “Mark my words.”
After Election:
Three days after Trump, in an appearance on “60 Minutes,” indicated he might build a fence instead (though in “certain areas, a wall is more appropriate”), congressional Republicans are hedging on whether they’ll support building the border wall, suggesting it may turn out to be some combination of wall, fencing, and “invisible fence” technology such as patrolling by drones.
Newt Gingrich—who’s reportedly being considered for Trump’s Secretary of State—admitted the president-elect’s promise to get Mexico to pay for it may have been a “campaign device.” “He may not spend much time trying to get Mexico to pay for it,” Gingrich said. “But it was a great campaign device.”
4. End war on coal
Before Election: The Democratic Party does not understand that coal is an abundant, clean, affordable, reliable domestic energy resource. Those who mine it and their families should be protected from the Democratic Party’s radical anti-coal agenda.
After Election: Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Friday told the Lexington Herald-Leader it’s “hard to tell” if the government will be able to expand the coal industry in a meaningful way.
5. Deport illegal aliens
Before Election: "We’re rounding ’em up in a very humane way, in a very nice way. And they’re going to be happy because they want to be legalized. And, by the way, I know it doesn’t sound nice. But not everything is nice." Trump in interview with CBS’s Scott Pelley
After Election: Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said of Trump “He’s not calling for mass deportation,” Priebus said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “He said, ‘No, only people who have committed crimes.’ And then only until all of that is taken care of will we look at what we are going to do next.”
Wait, isn't everyone who is in our country illegally already broken the law and committed a crime?!?!??!?!! Why wait for them to break in and steal and/or murder before deporting them?
6. Support for Israel
In September 2015, Trump said that under his administration he would “renegotiate” the Iran peace treaty. Trump called the deal the “stupidest deal of all time” and running mate Mike Pence said that the deal would be “ripped up.”
The Times of Israel reports that Trump may not scrap Obama’s Iran nuclear treaty after all.
“Appearing to walk back statements made by president-elect and other advisers,” senior Trump adviser Walid Phares claims that the treaty will instead be “renegotiated.” He also said that Trump might not actually move the US Embassy to Jerusalem immediately.
7. Investigation of Hillary's high crimes
Before Election: Trump said he would appoint a special prosecutor to investigate -- and convict Hillary over her use of a private email server. His campaign rallies were also marked by chants of "Lock her up" as supporters clamored for Trump to jail his opponent.
After Election: In a Wall Street Journal interview, Trump seemed to be less committed to the idea. "It's not something I've given a lot of thought, because I want to solve health care, jobs, border control, tax reform," he said.
Trump recently said: "THEY’RE GOOD PEOPLE. I DON’T WANT TO HURT THEM"
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/gop-president-elect-donald-trump-sex-marriage-settled/story?id=43513067
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/here-are-4-policies-that-trump-is-already-back-peddling-on/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/12/politics/donald-trump-campaign-promises/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/trump-health-care-agenda-evolves-toward-core-republican-thinking/2016/11/11/a31858c4-a828-11e6-8fc0-7be8f848c492_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_trumphealth-230pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/donald-trump-obamacare-interview/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/10/politics/giuliani-christie-interviews-clinton-prosecutor/
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-gop-nominee-mention-lgbtq-citizens-acceptance-speech/story?id=40791340
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-donald-trump-family-melania-ivanka-lesley-stahl/
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/trump-transgender-bathrooms-222257
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trumps-border-wall-may-be-collapsing-231567
Yes, it will be better than having Hillary or Obama in office.
However, any ground we might think we have gained or hope to gain is lost if we allow ourselves to be blind to reality, if we don't stand guard, if we rest on our laurels just because Trump won the election.
Where Hillary would have unwavering marched forward the moral and economic destruction of the US, Trump might listen and waffle our way from time to time.
A difference can only be made if we take advantage of this last open window of freedom and ability to influence how we are governed.
1. Fine with sodomite "marriage"
Before Election: During the Republican presidential primaries, Trump said the gay marriage issue should have been left to the states and that he would consider appointing judges to overrule the Supreme Court’s marriage decisions.
After Election: Republican President-elect Donald Trump said he’s “fine” with same-sex marriage as the law of the land, calling the issue “settled” by the Supreme Court. “It’s law,” he said in his first interview after the election with CBS’ “60 Minutes”. “It was settled in the Supreme Court. I mean, it’s done.”
Trump is also "fine" with perverted men using same bathroom as your wife, daughter, and mother.
Trump, who has spent his life in liberal New York City, referred to LGBT Republicans at the Republican National Convention and said during his campaign that transgender people should use whatever bathroom they feel comfortable using.
2. Obamacare
Before Election: “On day one of the Trump Administration, we will ask Congress to immediately deliver a full repeal of Obamacare"
After Election: After his meeting with President Obama, Trump said he would consider alternatives to an all-out appeal. Trump told the Wall St. Journal “Either Obamacare will be amended, or repealed and replaced."
Trump's presidential transition website also omits Trump's call to allow Americans to import prescription drugs from other countries where they are sold at lower prices
3. The Wall
Before Election: "I will build a great, great wall on our southern border, and I will make Mexico pay for that wall" Trump said repeatedly. “Mark my words.”
After Election:
Three days after Trump, in an appearance on “60 Minutes,” indicated he might build a fence instead (though in “certain areas, a wall is more appropriate”), congressional Republicans are hedging on whether they’ll support building the border wall, suggesting it may turn out to be some combination of wall, fencing, and “invisible fence” technology such as patrolling by drones.
Newt Gingrich—who’s reportedly being considered for Trump’s Secretary of State—admitted the president-elect’s promise to get Mexico to pay for it may have been a “campaign device.” “He may not spend much time trying to get Mexico to pay for it,” Gingrich said. “But it was a great campaign device.”
4. End war on coal
Before Election: The Democratic Party does not understand that coal is an abundant, clean, affordable, reliable domestic energy resource. Those who mine it and their families should be protected from the Democratic Party’s radical anti-coal agenda.
After Election: Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Friday told the Lexington Herald-Leader it’s “hard to tell” if the government will be able to expand the coal industry in a meaningful way.
5. Deport illegal aliens
Before Election: "We’re rounding ’em up in a very humane way, in a very nice way. And they’re going to be happy because they want to be legalized. And, by the way, I know it doesn’t sound nice. But not everything is nice." Trump in interview with CBS’s Scott Pelley
After Election: Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said of Trump “He’s not calling for mass deportation,” Priebus said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.” “He said, ‘No, only people who have committed crimes.’ And then only until all of that is taken care of will we look at what we are going to do next.”
Wait, isn't everyone who is in our country illegally already broken the law and committed a crime?!?!??!?!! Why wait for them to break in and steal and/or murder before deporting them?
6. Support for Israel
In September 2015, Trump said that under his administration he would “renegotiate” the Iran peace treaty. Trump called the deal the “stupidest deal of all time” and running mate Mike Pence said that the deal would be “ripped up.”
The Times of Israel reports that Trump may not scrap Obama’s Iran nuclear treaty after all.
“Appearing to walk back statements made by president-elect and other advisers,” senior Trump adviser Walid Phares claims that the treaty will instead be “renegotiated.” He also said that Trump might not actually move the US Embassy to Jerusalem immediately.
7. Investigation of Hillary's high crimes
Before Election: Trump said he would appoint a special prosecutor to investigate -- and convict Hillary over her use of a private email server. His campaign rallies were also marked by chants of "Lock her up" as supporters clamored for Trump to jail his opponent.
After Election: In a Wall Street Journal interview, Trump seemed to be less committed to the idea. "It's not something I've given a lot of thought, because I want to solve health care, jobs, border control, tax reform," he said.
Trump recently said: "THEY’RE GOOD PEOPLE. I DON’T WANT TO HURT THEM"
8. Trump says humans may be causing global warming
In Trump's past statements he said climate change is a "hoax" perpetrated by the Chinese to make U.S. manufacturing less competitive. Trump has also cited winter cold snaps as evidence that climate change is a "con job" and a "myth."
In an interview with editors and reporters at The New York Times, Trump said he would "keep an open mind" about the Paris accord, which he has repeatedly said he planned to either renegotiate or cancel if elected. Trump was also reported to have affirmed in the interview held two weeks after the election that human activity and global warming may be linked. "I think there is some connectivity," he said. "Some, something. It depends on how much."
9. Common Core supporters are on the short list for the next Secretary of Education
So much for "draining the swamp", two individuals reportedly on Trump’s short list for the education secretary post are Common Core supporters Democrat Michelle Rhee and Republican donor Betsy DeVos.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/shift-trump-humans-causing-global-warming-43726021
http://krmg.com/fullsite?return=%2Fphoto%2Fap%2Fpolitical%2Fin-shift-trump-says-humans-may-be-causing-global-w%2FpDgCBX%2F
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/theyre-theyre-good-people-i-dont-want-to-hurt-them-did-trump-just-walk-back-his-promise-to-prosecute-hillary_112016
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/21/american-family-association-alarming-trump-considering-common-core-supporters-education-secretary/
In an interview with editors and reporters at The New York Times, Trump said he would "keep an open mind" about the Paris accord, which he has repeatedly said he planned to either renegotiate or cancel if elected. Trump was also reported to have affirmed in the interview held two weeks after the election that human activity and global warming may be linked. "I think there is some connectivity," he said. "Some, something. It depends on how much."
9. Common Core supporters are on the short list for the next Secretary of Education
So much for "draining the swamp", two individuals reportedly on Trump’s short list for the education secretary post are Common Core supporters Democrat Michelle Rhee and Republican donor Betsy DeVos.
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/shift-trump-humans-causing-global-warming-43726021
http://krmg.com/fullsite?return=%2Fphoto%2Fap%2Fpolitical%2Fin-shift-trump-says-humans-may-be-causing-global-w%2FpDgCBX%2F
http://www.thedailysheeple.com/theyre-theyre-good-people-i-dont-want-to-hurt-them-did-trump-just-walk-back-his-promise-to-prosecute-hillary_112016
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/11/21/american-family-association-alarming-trump-considering-common-core-supporters-education-secretary/
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/gop-president-elect-donald-trump-sex-marriage-settled/story?id=43513067
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/here-are-4-policies-that-trump-is-already-back-peddling-on/
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/12/politics/donald-trump-campaign-promises/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/trump-health-care-agenda-evolves-toward-core-republican-thinking/2016/11/11/a31858c4-a828-11e6-8fc0-7be8f848c492_story.html?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_trumphealth-230pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/donald-trump-obamacare-interview/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/10/politics/giuliani-christie-interviews-clinton-prosecutor/
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-gop-nominee-mention-lgbtq-citizens-acceptance-speech/story?id=40791340
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-donald-trump-family-melania-ivanka-lesley-stahl/
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/trump-transgender-bathrooms-222257
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trumps-border-wall-may-be-collapsing-231567
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Origin of Roman Catholic practices
"Confiding then in the power of Christianity to resist the infection of evil ... feeling also that these usages had originally come from primitive revelations and from the instinct of nature, though they had been corrupted ... and that they were moreover possessed of the very archetypes, of which paganism attempted the shadows; the rulers of the Church from early times were prepared, should the occasion arise, to adopt, to imitate, or sanction the existing rites and customs of the populace, as well as the philosophy of the educated class." ... "are all of pagan origin, and sanctified by their adoption into the Church."
John Henry Newman, a cardinal by Pope Leo III in 1879
Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, 1878, p351-353
http://www.newmanreader.org/works/development/
John Henry Newman, a cardinal by Pope Leo III in 1879
Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine, 1878, p351-353
http://www.newmanreader.org/works/development/
Monday, November 14, 2016
Your Next Pro Sodom President
Before Election: During the Republican presidential primaries, Trump said the gay marriage issue should have been left to the states and that he would consider appointing judges to overrule the Supreme Court’s marriage decisions.
After Election: Republican President-elect Donald Trump said he’s “fine” with same-sex marriage as the law of the land, calling the issue “settled” by the Supreme Court. “It’s law,” he said in his first interview after the election with CBS’ “60 Minutes”. “It was settled in the Supreme Court. I mean, it’s done.”
Trump is also "fine" with perverted men using same bathroom as your wife, daughter, and mother.
Trump, who has spent his life in liberal New York City, referred to LGBT Republicans at the Republican National Convention and said during his campaign that transgender people should use whatever bathroom they feel comfortable using.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-gop-nominee-mention-lgbtq-citizens-acceptance-speech/story?id=40791340
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/trump-transgender-bathrooms-222257
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-donald-trump-family-melania-ivanka-lesley-stahl/
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-gop-nominee-mention-lgbtq-citizens-acceptance-speech/story?id=40791340
http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-gop-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/trump-transgender-bathrooms-222257
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/60-minutes-donald-trump-family-melania-ivanka-lesley-stahl/
Wednesday, November 09, 2016
Example of "Predictive Programming"
Example of "Predictive Programming"
Predictive programming, a method of mass mind control by which people are conditioned, by news editorials, commentaries, movies, books, and other media to accept and even instigate planned future scenarios. Researcher Alan Watt defines this phenomenon as “the power of suggestion using the media of fiction to create a desired outcome”
This article came out 8-Nov at 4pm ahead of the election results being released:
LAPD Prepping For “Riot Mode” In Some Neighborhoods If Donald Trump Wins
[excerpts]
While not overtly ramping things up as much as the New York Police Department is tonight on the East Coast, the Los Angeles Police Department has quietly put in place plans to counter any disturbances on the streets if GOP nominee Donald Trump is elected president. “The polite thing to say is that this is not unusual, but this has been a very unusual election,” said a senior law enforcement official with knowledge of tonight’s LAPD plans. “We are ready to go into riot mode if required, if the order comes.”
“Tempers are frayed in a number of our communities from the inflammatory language and policies that some have proposed,” the official added, noting that minority-dominated neighborhoods in East L.A. and South L.A. are of concern. “If the outcome sees Mr. Trump elected, measures are in place to maintain calm, if need be.”
With that, the Department of Homeland Security is also said to have beefed up contingency plans for tonight in Los Angeles and several other major U.S. cities.
“We don’t want anything to go sideways,” Ramirez said, noting the antagonizing nature of the election for some L.A. communities with regard to proposed immigration policies, a lack of outreach, and warnings of crimes that some have taken to be coded language. “We’re always monitoring things and asking citizens to be vigilant too,” he added.
The situation is far different in New York, where both Trump and Hillary Clinton have set up their election headquarters. Earlier today, the NYPD and the Secret Service began upping their presence and closing off areas of Manhattan.
“You’re going to see a lot of measures taken very visibly around all of the election activity on Tuesday,” NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio said today of the rare occasion of two Presidential candidates being in the Big Apple on Election Night. “Obviously all five boroughs, particularly the events will be around the candidates in Manhattan.”
then we see this happening when the election results are released:
Trump victory sparks angry protests across California: 'Not my president'
[excerpts]
The election of Donald Trump to the presidency sparked protests early Wednesday across California, drawing crowds to city streets and college campuses.
The demonstrations reflected sadness, anger and bursts of rage. Crowds openly disavowed the president-elect and a few resorted to vandalism.
Shortly after Trump delivered a victory speech in New York, up to 1,500 people gathered at UCLA. The demonstration peaked about 1 a.m., when a Trump piñata was set on fire in a trash can outside a Westwood Boulevard store.
N.J. Omorogieva, 19, said she was “heartbroken” by the election’s result when she spotted the crowd in Westwood while walking home.
In Oakland, demonstrators smashed a window at the Oakland Tribune newsroom and ignited trash containers and tires, the East Bay Times reported. Protesters also burned Trump in effigy, KNTV reported.
At UC Santa Barbara, hundreds marched near the campus, with some chanting, “Not my president. Not my president.”
One person carried a Mexican flag, according to video posted by the student newspaper, the Daily Nexus.
About 500 students marched through the La Jolla campus of UC San Diego, protesting Trump’s win and chanting his name with an expletive.
At UCLA, some students lifted their arms up while demonstrating in Westwood Village. Others chanted, “Not my president,” according to social media users who documented the scene on the ground.
Demonstrations were also reported in downtown Los Angeles, at UC Santa Cruz and UC Irvine.
A throng marching in Oakland chanted, “Who’s got the power? We got the power.”
Protests in the Bay Area city centered downtown and also saw a march along Highway 24, where a woman was struck by an SUV. She was rushed to the hospital with “major injuries,” California Highway Patrol Sgt. Matt Langford told the San Francisco Chronicle.
Small fires in Oakland also prompted the closure of a Bay Area Rapid Transit station
In downtown L.A., anger simmered as a crowd gathered near City Hall. Some property was defaced, including a fence scrawled with graffiti insulting Trump.
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-supporters-burn-american-flag-riot-threaten-to-kill-trump-after-losing-election/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)