These following girls. killed by Gardasil, were someone’s daughter, someone’s friend, someone’s sister, and the greed and the moral depravity of the Big Pharma corporation that killed them, is unacceptable.
“I just wish someone had warned me about Gardasil……. My Jasmine would still be here with us.”
According to the mother of Jasmine Renata, aged 18, her daughter was murdered by Merck. There was no autopsy, no official recrimination of Merck, just a grieving mother left to bury her only daughter.
Unfortunately, this scenario is being played out time and time again and nobody is holding Merck criminally accountable for the all-to-deadly results of Gardasil. The reckless use of this killer vaccine continues unabated despite the fact that Merck was recently ordered to pay six million dollars to another parent of a daughter that was murdered by Gardasil. Patient safety be damned.
On October 9th, 2011, California governor Brown signed AB 499 into law which provides that the Merck manufactured, Gardasil, designed to prevent cervical cancer, can be administered to children 12 years old and up without parental consent.
First of all, government should not be in the business of mandating personal choices and government should never be allowed to legislate choices which should be reserved for parents with regard to their children’s health and welfare.
Gardasil has resulted in needless tragedy for over 40,000 children who have been vaccinated by well intentioned doctors who are ignorant of the side effects.
The American public should remember Merck, the creator of Vioxx. This is the same Merck, who only after intense pressure from the medical community and the media decided to pull the dangerous drug, Vioxx, from the market after an estimated 140,000 adverse reactions had already occurred. The pulling of Vioxx from the shelves occurred only after a safety trial was stopped because there was an undeniable and increased risk for serious cardiovascular dangers such as heart attacks and strokes from using the drug.
Gardasil Discounted By Its Own Advocates
Dr. Diane Harper, the lead researcher in the effects of Gardasil, recently made a presentation to the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination. Gardasil was developed by Pharmaceutical giant, Merck, to prevent HPV in sexually active girls. These same findings were presented by Dr. Sam Benjamin on his radio show (KTAR 620AM, Phoenix) on July 30, 2013.
The Gardasil Spokesperson Tells America Why They Should Not Give Gardasil To Our Girls
At the conference, Harper made the following statements:
· ” Seventy percent of HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in one year.
· After two years, the rate of non-treatment remission climbs to 90%.
· Of the remaining 10% of HPV infections, only half go on to develop cervical cancer.
· Eighty percent of all HPV infections occur in the third world.
· There will be decrease in cervical cancer rates until at 70% of the population is vaccinated, including boys… ”the incidence of cervical cancer in the U.S. is so low that “if we get the vaccine and continue PAP screening, we will not lower the rate of cervical cancer in the US.” The highest amount of minimal decrease will appear in 60 years. ”
· There have been no efficacy trials in girls under the age of 15, but Merck is pushing the vaccination of children under five. Harper went on to say that “if you vaccinate a child, she won’t keep immunity in puberty and you do nothing to prevent cervical cancer.”
· When Dr. Harper appeared on ABC News to promote the efficacy of Gardasil, she admitted that “The rate of serious adverse events is greater than the incidence rate of cervical cancer,” and the numbers bear out her statement. Merck and the CDC have determined that 1 out of every 912 who received Gardasil in a large study, (see page 8) died. Yet, the cervical cancer death rate is only 1 out of every 40,000 women per year. In other words, girls are better off not taking the shot because the Gardasil shot kills the girls in greater numbers than does the disease it purports to treat.
Dr. Harper is one of the premier spokespersons for the use of Gardasil. I am certain that all of you are asking what I am already thinking, why is she being so honest about the potential lack of success related to Gardasil? It is called “protecting your malpractice behind” with prior notice.
The New England Journal of Medicine
The New England Journal of Medicine found that there remains no conclusive proof that Gardasil altered the course of HPV-16 or HPV-18 infectionfor which the patient was symptomatic prior to the administration of the first dose.
Gardasil Providers Better Have A Good Attorney
The recent Gardasil study by the CDC claims that the vaccine has significantly reduced HPV infections. However, the study’s results and faulty methodology disprove the claim in the title. Amazingly, the authors’ claim bears little resemblance to the study’s results. The analysis demonstrating that, in reality, no conclusions can be drawn and results of the study are inconsistent, the study design is flawed and is based on non-matched samples, and mixed the groups being compared. The latter two statements are major research flaws. (Note: The author teaches research methods to graduate students).
The results of the study shows that the use of Gardasil is contraindicated as revealed by the following snapshot of the results.
“Ages 20-24 saw an infection rate increase from 18.5% to 19.9%—1.08 times more infections.
Ages 25-29 saw an infection rate increase from 11.8% to 13.1%—1.11 times more infections.”
The study is an obvious attempt to provide legal cover for Merck because of the multitudes of deaths that have transpired and the fact that Merck has been forced to pay out millions in victim compensation because of the use of the heinous vaccine. However, as my father used to say, the more you stir the proverbial poop, the worse it stinks and Gardasil stinks!\
No comments:
Post a Comment