Follow @taxnomor

Pages

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Global Tax Scam Shifts From Climate Change To Poverty

The elite are determined to rob the American people blind while creating a slush fund for world government by any means possible

Global Tax Scam Shifts From Climate Change To Poverty
Paul Joseph Watson
Tuesday, September 21, 2010


As the science behind global warming becomes increasingly discredited and its proponents are exposed as eugenics-obsessed control freaks who care only about destroying freedom [2], the effort to make Americans pay a global tax has shifted from the justification of climate change to that of poverty.

As we documented on Sunday [3], leaders from 60 nations will be meeting at the UN this week to push a tax on world financial transactions, formally launching a massive program to bankrupt the middle class and enrich the coffers of global government.

Separately, the leaders of Spain and France are also now calling for new “financing sources” with which to build the infrastructure of a one world government. Remember, this has nothing to do with poverty. As the leaked Danish text revealed [4], global institutions such as the IMF and the World Bank have no intention of handing the money looted from American taxpayers to poorer countries, they will merely continue to keep the third world in bondage with crippling loans while withholding the real wealth for themselves.

“We need to make more effort to look for alternative financing sources … that aren’t as vulnerable as the budgets of developed countries when faced with crises like the one we’re seeing today,” said Spanish Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero.

“Both he and French President Nicolas Sarkozy called for some form of financial tax to raise money to combat poverty, an idea already rejected by the International Monetary Fund and many Group of 20 major developed and developing nations,” reports Reuters [5].

Although climate change still gets a token mention in the call for a global tax, the justification of poverty has firmly overtaken it as the primary ruse via which globalists plan to conduct a massive transfer of wealth – not to poor nations – but to their own back pockets.

As the recently leaked UN blueprint revealed [6], the elite are determined to use a global tax as just one of the weapons in their arsenal to dismantle the middle class of richer nations.

In their own words, the globalists talk of their aim to “limit and redirect the aspirations for a better life of rising middle classes around the world,” in other words to reduce the standard of living for the middle classes in Western Europe and America.

As the opening session paper puts it: “The real challenge comes from the exponential growth of the global consumerist society driven by ever higher aspirations of the upper and middle layers in rich countries as well as the expanding demand of emerging middle-class in developing countries. Our true ambition should be therefore creating incentives for the profound transformation of attitudes and consumption styles.”

This is globalist talk for dismantling the middle classes by looting them with global taxes and consumption levies in the name of alleviating poverty in poorer areas of the world and stopping climate change. However, as we have already explained, this is merely a ruse. The money will not be “redistributed” to the poor, it will be swallowed up by the same globalist institutions running the scam.

To achieve their goal, the UN will have to oversee “nothing less than a fundamental transformation of the global economy,” states the report. In other words, economic growth will wither and be replaced by a “green economy” and a “post-industrial revolution.”

Since Spain’s “fundamental transformation” of its economy over to a “green economy” has devastated the country, with unemployment hitting a crippling 20 per cent [8], it’s unsurprising that Zapatero is now calling for a new global levy on financial transactions in an effort to force already destitute Americans to pick up the tab for the failed and economically crippling “green” measures that he inflicted on his own country while doing the bidding of his globalist masters.


Full article and references:

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Obama's War on America's Seniors

Obama's War on America's Seniors
By Peter Ferrara on 9.15.10 @ 6:09AM


Seniors citizens probably provided less support for President Obama in the 2008 election than any other voter bloc. That reflects the wisdom of age. But for President Obama, apparently it's payback time, because he is conducting a comprehensive economic assault on America's senior citizens.


First He Trashed Medicare

A Democrat campaign theme this fall is that those scary Republicans want to end Medicare as we know it. But that is not possible, because President Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the Democrats have already done that, in Obamacare.

The Chief Actuary for Medicare has publicly reported that the Medicare payment rates for the doctors and hospitals serving seniors will be cut by 30% over the next 3 years. By 2019, those Medicare payment rates will be lower than under Medicaid, which leaves the poor often unable to find doctors and hospitals willing to serve them. Medicare's Chief Actuary reports that ultimately under Obamacare Medicare payment rates will be only one-third of what will be paid by private insurance and only half of what is paid by Medicaid. Good luck to Grandma in finding a doctor then.

If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep him, President Obama promised in trying to sell Obamacare to the nation. But the question under Medicare now, after Obamacare, is whether your doctor will be willing to keep you.

Last month's Annual Report of the Medicare Board of Trustees revealed that Obamacare's total cuts to Medicare run to over $1 trillion over the first 10 years of full implementation, and to nearly $5 trillion over the first 20 years. These are cuts for seniors who are already retired!

Ultimately, by the end of the Trustees' Report projection period, Medicare Part A is cut by 60%. Medicare Part B is cut by 43%. Translation: this means the end of Medicare as we know it.

These are all primarily cuts in Medicare payments to the doctors and hospitals for the services, health care, and treatments they provide to the nation's seniors. That includes hip and knee replacements, sophisticated diagnostics through MRIs and CT scans, treatment for cancer and heart disease, and the services and care from the specialists that keep seniors functional and alive. If the government is not going to pay, then seniors are not going to get the health services, treatment and care they expect.

Indeed, the Medicare Chief Actuary reports that even before these cuts two-thirds of hospitals were already losing money on Medicare patients. Health providers will either have to withdraw from serving Medicare patients, or eventually go into bankruptcy.

These draconian Medicare cuts were the basis for the CBO score repeatedly cited by President Obama that Obamacare would actually reduce the deficit while expanding or adopting three entitlement programs. Too bad the President never disclosed that in trying to sell Obamacare to the nation. Indeed, in his weekly radio address to the nation on August 14, it was these draconian Medicare cuts that President Obama was touting in lauding Obamacare for "adding at least a dozen years to the fiscal health of Medicare -- the single longest extension in history." (Only a dozen years because most of the money raided from Medicare is taken to finance Obamacare.) The President thinks he can play seniors for fools.

Obama's Medicare policy is like trying to maintain our national defense by refusing to pay the people who make the tanks, the planes, the ships, the guns, the bullets, and the bombs. How long do you think our national defense would last under that policy? The same goes for Medicare now under Obamacare.

Contrast this policy atrocity with the proposed reforms to Medicare under Rep. Paul Ryan's Roadmap for America. Ryan is the ranking Republican on the House Budget Committee who will become the Committee Chairman after this fall's elections. The Congressional Budget Office has scored Ryan's Roadmap as achieving full and permanent solvency for Social Security, full and permanent solvency for Medicare, and a permanently balanced federal budget, without tax increases.

Ryan's Roadmap, which he fully explains in a website devoted entirely to the Roadmap, includes no cuts in Social Security or Medicare, or changes of any sort, for today's seniors. The reforms apply only to those who are under age 55 today. For those future retirees, he would reform Medicare into Medicare Advantage for everyone. Medicare Advantage is the option already existing under Medicare allowing seniors to choose private insurance coverage for their benefits under the program, which nearly one-fourth of seniors have already chosen because it gives them a better deal.

Just as in Medicare Advantage today, future seniors under Ryan's Roadmap would be able to use Medicare funds to choose from a wide range of private insurance options, including the highly beneficial and empowering Health Savings Accounts. The funding for these options would grow more slowly over time for higher income and healthier seniors, and so they would have to pay some more out of their pockets for the coverage. That is how the long-term Medicare financing gaps are closed and full solvency for Medicare achieved. Additional funding is provided, however, for low and modest income, and less healthy, seniors, so they are fully protected from any higher costs.

But this is too much filthy capitalism for President Obama, and his modern new socialist Democrats, so they wrongly trash it. But unlike Obamacare's wild and irresponsible Medicare cuts, this is a carefully designed and structured reform plan, which is far better for future seniors, taxpayers, and America.


Now He Wants to Cut Your Social Security

But President Obama is already moving on, to cut your Social Security next, as he also revealed in his August 14 Saturday radio address. In that address, he denounces the idea of solving Social Security's problems by allowing young workers the freedom to choose to save and invest some of their taxes in their own personal accounts.

Such accounts would enable these workers to enjoy much higher benefits in the future than Social Security even promises, let alone what it can pay, at just standard, long-term investment returns. By taking some of the long-term burden off of Social Security for financing future benefits, these accounts can also solve the program's long-term financing crisis. That is shown by reports from the Chief Actuary of Social Security still available on his website. Such personal accounts would also do far more to reduce government spending over the long run than any other possible alternative.

But the ideologically far left Obama can't stand the idea of workers and retirees supporting themselves more through the private sector. He calls that privatization, which means again too much filthy capitalism for his tastes. Moreover, if seniors are self-supporting through their own personal accounts, they are no longer dependent on Obama's secular socialist political machine. That is not the change for America that Obama has in mind.

If he rejects personal accounts, however, then how is President Obama going to solve Social Security's long-term financial crisis, which even his own Presidential Debt Commission realizes is real? The only alternatives are to raise payroll taxes or cut benefits.

Raising payroll taxes is out because President Obama pledged over and over to get elected that he would not raise taxes on anyone making less than $250,000 a year. If he refuses even to consider personal accounts as inconsistent with his socialist ideology, that leaves only cutting benefits.

And this is exactly what his Presidential Debt Commission is plotting to reveal right after the election. Leaks indicate that among the options being considered are delaying the retirement age, changing the basic benefit formula, and delaying or slashing COLAs. Personal accounts for younger workers are once again a far better idea, for the young, for seniors, and for America.


Interest, Dividends, and Capital Gains

But President Obama's economic assault on America's seniors doesn't stop there. Under his economic policies, interest rates have been negligible since he came into office. But interest on a lifetime of accumulated savings is a substantial source of income for many seniors.

Yes, these rock bottom interest rates are maintained as part of President Obama's broader economic policies, to promote economic recovery. But those broader policies are not working, and no consideration is given to the harmful effect on seniors. There is no offset or compensating policy to alleviate the impact on retirees.

Moreover, under President Obama's comprehensive tax rate increases that start to go into effect next year, the top tax rate on corporate dividends will nearly triple, from 15% today, to 43.4%, counting the new 3.8% tax on capital income added by Obamacare. No, this doesn't affect only the rich. Companies will respond to this wild, draconian tax increase mostly by cutting off corporate dividends, as they will no longer be able to attract sufficient capital through such heavily taxed payments.

That will hurt millions of more modest income seniors who have invested some of their lifetime of savings to obtain corporate dividends as a supplement to their income. But President Obama and his New Socialist Democrats can't understand this, just as they can't understand that raising tax rates on the nation's employers and investors, because they are "the rich," harms average working people, who lose their jobs or suffer lower wages as a result. Politicians who make a career of decrying and raiding "the rich" are crass pirates who would have no role in public life in a responsible society.

President Obama's capital gains tax increases also hurt seniors the most, because they have been around the longest to accumulate most of the capital gains.


The Disgrace of AARP

And where has AARP been during this comprehensive economic assault on America's seniors? That self-styled spokesman for the nation's seniors began as an insurance marketing scam. Today it is a big bucks Washington bureaucracy that looks out for itself, and just another phony liberal/left front group providing cover for the expanding socialist takeover of America.

It too thinks it can play seniors for fools. Instead of warning seniors about the draconian Medicare cuts in Obamacare, it sought to provide cover for its Washington Democrat buddies with a slick, big bucks marketing campaign in favor of Obamacare. The truth is that AARP is all about partisan politics. Republicans can try to just slightly slow the growth of Medicare to balance the budget, and AARP is out screaming that the Republicans are destroying the program. But the Democrats can mercilessly trash it with trillions in draconian cuts, and AARP doesn't even notice. Instead, AARP spends seniors' money to try to delude them into supporting it.

Ya'll are too polite at these meetings AARP holds to gull you into the socialist political machine. Check out instead the Alliance for Prosperity, a newly emerging, fully equipped, alternative to AARP.


Seniors' Payback Time

During the 2008 campaign, then candidate Obama told Joe the Plumber that he wanted to spread the wealth. Apparently, President Obama's concept of spreading the wealth includes sacking both the Medicare and Social Security systems on which America's seniors have come to rely, in favor of others the President's progressive vision deems more worthy.

But this fall, America's seniors will have the opportunity for their own payback time. President Obama, however, thinks he doesn't need them. He thinks he can whip up what he imagines is his mindless political base into a frenzy. That is what the ludicrous, groundless attacks on the Tea Party as racist are all about. And it is what the federal lawsuit against the Arizona immigration enforcement law is all about. That Arizona law explicitly prohibits racial profiling, and only seeks to enforce current federal law.

But the President himself is overlooking the brutal fact that Hispanics have suffered double-digit unemployment throughout his presidency. And African Americans have suffered a long-term depression, with unemployment among them persistently over 15%. Last week came the report that the poverty rate has rocketed upwards to record shattering levels. Who does President Obama think he is fooling now?

Not America's seniors, who this fall won't be caught like chickens voting for Colonel Sanders.

Retrieved 15 SEP 2010 from:

http://spectator.org/archives/2010/09/15/obamas-war-on-americas-seniors/print

Monday, September 13, 2010

Chinese General Threatens U.S. with Debt Retaliation

We all knew this was the plan all along, here is evidence we were right...

Chinese General Says U.S. Carrier in Yellow Sea May Result in Retaliation

By Bloomberg News

A Chinese general said U.S. plans to send a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier to the Yellow Sea may lead to retaliation from China, the biggest foreign holder of Treasuries.

"Imagine what the consequence will be if China's biggest debtor nation challenges its creditor nation," Major General Luo Yuan, deputy secretary general of the People's Liberation Army Academy of Military Sciences, wrote in an editorial today in the state-controlled English-language Global Times.

Retrieved from
http://www.thefreepressonline.co.uk/news_print/1/2030.htm

Tuesday, September 07, 2010

Bank Run 2011?

Bank Run 2011?



Let me be plain and blunt. The "unexpected developments" Bernanke referred to is the collapse of the global banks. This is FED speak and to those in the loop, this is the dire warning. So many renowned economists have misdiagnosed the objective and consequences of quantitative easing. Central bankers' scribes and the global mass media hoodwinked the people by saying that QE will enable the banks to lend monies to cash-starved companies and jump start the economy. The low interest rate regime would encourage all and sundry to borrow, consume and invest. This was the fairy tale. ... The multiplier effect of fractional reserve banking did not take off. Bank lending in fact stalled.

When the ball hits the ceiling fan, sometime early 2011 at the earliest, there will be massive bank runs. I expect that the FED and other central banks will pre-empt such a run and will do the following: 1) Disallow cash withdrawals from banks beyond a certain amount, say US$1,000 per day; 2) Disallow cash transactions up to a certain amount, say US$10,000 for certain transactions; 3) Transactions (investments) for metals (gold and silver) will be restricted; 4) Worst-case scenario – the confiscation of gold AS HAPPENED IN WORLD WAR II. 5) Imposition of capital controls etc.; 6) Legislations that will compel most daily commercial transactions to be conducted through Debit and or Credit Cards; 7) Legislations to make it a criminal offence for any contraventions of the above.




5 Doomsday Scenarios for the U.S. Economy

1. Housing's Mini-Bubble Pops

2. You Break the Economy

3. Toxic Assets Return

4. Europe Falls Apart

5. Debt Finally Catches Up to Us

Saturday, September 04, 2010

Wallis admits funding from Soros

Wallis admits funding from Soros; wealthy urged to give it away
Posted on Sep 3, 2010 | by Erin Roach

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (BP)--After initially denying it, Jim Wallis, a leader of the evangelical left, has admitted his Sojourners organization has received funding from leftist billionaire George Soros, who has financed groups promoting abortion, atheism and "gay marriage."

Marvin Olasky, editor of World magazine, mentioned in a column this summer that Soros bankrolled Sojourners with a $200,000 grant in 2004, followed by at least two more grants, all while Wallis said he knew of "no connections" between "religious progressives" and liberal groups "that are as direct as the Religious Right's ties to right-wing funders."

Wallis frequently claims to be neither left nor right, but "prophetic," speaking to both sides. Olasky called on Wallis to admit that he is clearly on the left.

In a subsequent interview with Patheos, an interfaith website, Wallis said, "Glenn Beck lies for a living. I'm sad to see Marvin Olasky doing the same thing." Later Wallis apologized to Olasky and said in a statement that he had not been able to recall such funding at the time he denied it.

"The spirit of the accusation was that Sojourners is beholden to funders on the political left, which is false," Wallis said. "The allegation concerned three grants received over 10 years from [Soros'] Open Society Institute that made up the tiniest fraction of Sojourners' funding during that decade -- so small that I hadn't remembered them. Sojourners doesn't belong to the political left or right."

Jay Richards wrote for National Review Online Aug. 25 that Sojourners received at least 49 separate foundation grants between 2003 and 2009 totaling more than $2 million. "Not one of these is from a discernibly conservative foundation," Richards wrote. "Very few are from discernibly Christian foundations."

Three grants were from the (Barbra) Streisand Foundation, which also contributes to People for the American Way and Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Richards noted.

"You don't have to be keen-witted to figure out that Sojourners is overwhelmingly a left-wing operation, optimized to brand left-wing ideas for Christians, ideologically moored on the left, and funded to a significant degree by secular, left-wing donors with little interest in the health of the church," Richards wrote. "Certainly this fact is apparent to the trustees and officers of many left-wing foundations."

'GIVING PLEDGE' URGES PHILANTHROPY -- Warren Buffett joined Bill and Melinda Gates in launching the Giving Pledge, "an effort to invite the wealthiest individuals and families in America to commit to giving the majority of their wealth to philanthropy."

In August, 40 families and individuals had signed the pledge to give away at least half their fortunes either during their lifetimes or after their deaths, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, filmmaker George Lucas, media mogul Ted Turner and oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens.

"We've really just started but already we've had a terrific response," Buffett, the third-richest person in the world, said. "At its core, the Giving Pledge is about asking wealthy families to have important conversations about their wealth and how it will be used. We're delighted that so many people are doing just that -- and that so many have decided to not only take this pledge but also to commit to sums far greater than the 50 percent minimum level."

Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, said the pledge could be a new status symbol.

"It will be something that's very important to the wealthy -- to be able to say, 'I give my money away as much as I spend it in all of these other exciting ways,'" Palmer told Reuters. "Clearly pressure on the elite is high right now to say that they are giving money away, and that will make it trendy."

Wall Street Journal wealth columnist Robert Frank said the recession has prompted America's rich to search for new status symbols.

"Yachts, private jets, seaside mansions are so 2007," Frank wrote. "But being wealthy enough and generous enough to get on the Giving Pledge list may quickly become the ultimate badge of status -- both in the U.S. and abroad."

Bradford Smith of the Foundation Center said the pledge at least would be a productive use of billions.

"If philanthropy is indeed becoming the new status symbol of the wealthy, it will do a lot more to change the world than buying Gucci bags," he told Reuters.

Retrieved from:
http://www.bpnews.net/bpnews.asp?id=33639